Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <001d01c1151e$aa4b7a80$47a23209@fishkill.ibm.com>
From: "John Fortin" <fortinj AT attglobal DOT net>
To: "Earnie Boyd" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <034601c11505$0a368710$6d07a8c0 AT miro>
Subject: Re: is cygwin lame???
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 11:27:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

Hmmm, I am assuming that based on the subject your purpose was to enflame
the passions of people who use cygwin everyday.
If this was supposed to be a request for information, you style leaves a bit
to be desired.
...Or your manners stopped evolving when you were ten.


John

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Scheibler" <michael DOT scheibler AT onevision DOT de>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 8:26 AM
Subject: is cygwin lame???


>
> We are experiencing a major difference in performance between bash on a
real
> unix system and on cygwin. I can't imagine that this is a problem of
> Windows - it might be a catastrophe in os design, but you can't say that
> it's THAT slow.
> Now we looked at out network monitoring tools and found this:
>
> .
> .
> .
> .
> 31384 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS
Offset:
> 598 Length: 1
> 31385 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_CHECK_IF_POSSIBLE Z:\make_classdll.sh
> SUCCESS Read: Offset: 599 Length: 1
> 31386 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS
Offset:
> 599 Length: 1
> 31387 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_CHECK_IF_POSSIBLE Z:\make_classdll.sh
> SUCCESS Read: Offset: 600 Length: 1
> 31388 13:04:10 bash.exe:112 FASTIO_READ Z:\make_classdll.sh SUCCESS
Offset:
> 600 Length: 1
> .
> There are hundreds of these messages. Does this mean, that bash reads a
> shell script one byte after the other?? Z:\ is mapped to a linux raid
> machine using Samba. Is this a problem of Cygwin, Samba, or is our
> monitoring tool lying?
>
> Michael
>





--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/