Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:17:43 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Mailing list etiquette [Was: Re: SETUP WIZARD FOR CYGWIN?XFREE86] Message-ID: <20010724151743.B1539@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <001201c11440$f5acf5a0$806410ac AT local> <20010724112652 DOT G9776 AT redhat DOT com> <3B5DA52D DOT 2020304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <13435078840 DOT 20010724210651 AT logos-m DOT ru> <001e01c11467$614b5b00$6401a8c0 AT net> <3B5DBF1D DOT 1000307 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3B5DBF1D.1000307@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:31:57PM -0400 For the record, I've sent Bobby private email a couple of times warning him about off-topic posts. I've gotten private complaints from readers of this mailing list about his messages. I've actually started composing several public messages in the last few days announcing "This is your last warning" but I really really really hate blocking people from posting here unless they are actually clueless spammers. So, I appreciate Chuck's analysis here. It was better than I could have done. Bobby, *please* think three times before sending email here. To be blunt, 99% of what you send is really of questionable value. cgf On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:31:57PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Bobby: >1) Why was your message quoted below part of the "SETUP WIZARD FOR >CYGWIN?XFREE86" thread? What does it have to do with anything that had >been discussed in that thread previously? If you wanted to post this >message to the list, it should have been a NEW message with a NEW >subject heading. I note that this is a common practice for you, Bobby >-- you often reply to an ongoing thread with a new topic. *Don't do >that*. New topic == New subject line, new thread. > >If you really want to tie it to the previous thread, you can use the >Was: modifier like I did in this message. > >#2) Why was your message directed to egor? ("egor, I'm final...") Is it >part of an ongoing private conversation you've been having with him? If >so, then it should have been a private email. If not, is there some >context that makes a mingw port of CSound particularly interesting to >egor, yet requires that the message be public? > >For instance, I addressed this email to you, Bobby, because the context >is: I am commenting directly on the content of YOUR earlier message. I >don't see how your message (again, as quoted below) directly relates to >egor's prior posting; therefore it shouldn't have been addressed to him >AFAICT. Furthermore, I posted this message to the public list, rather >than sending privately, because I feel that a public discussion of >mailing list etiquette as expected on cygwin@ may be useful. > >#3) I kind of doubt that your message, as quoted below, was of interest >to the list, since the message concerns a port of CSound to Win32, using >the mingw compiler -- not cygwin. > >Perhaps you should have announced your Csound port on the mingw mailing >list? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/