Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Jonadab the Unsightly One" Organization: There is no organisation. To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:36:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: Text editors under Cygnus Reply-to: jonadab AT bright DOT net Message-ID: <3B5CA709.8730.25C9FD4@localhost> In-reply-to: <80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CF80@wilber.adroit.com> X-Eric-Conspiracy: My name is not Eric. X-Platform: Windows '95 OSR2 (heavily adjusted and customised) X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12) # The X in Xemacs does not refer to the X window system. It did originally. But these days both Emacs and XEmacs can be compiled and used either with or without X. One vs the other is a tradeoff: XEmacs version releases are a step ahead of the FSF's Emacs releases, but more elisp packages work in Emacs than in XEmacs. What is unfortunate is that the two are fairly mutually incompatible; it is _possible_ to write lisp that will work in either, but as far as that goes it's _possible_ to write code that will work in either C or Perl -- but it's an exercise in adaptive engineering. I use Emacs because it's what I started using when I wasn't clear on the differences, and now I have megabytes of lisp I don't want to port. -- Your font seems to be: proportional fixed ^ | (Fontmeter only accurate for about 90% of fonts.) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/