Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:29:12 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: problem with tar -xvzf and permissions on W2K Message-ID: <20010720092912.X730@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" References: <12F176DD950ED411B68E0050DA14ED1033890F AT jupiter DOT gunzphoto DOT com DOT au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <12F176DD950ED411B68E0050DA14ED1033890F@jupiter.gunzphoto.com.au>; from neillunn@gunz.com.au on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:10:34AM +1000 On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 11:10:34AM +1000, Neil Lunn wrote: > >From: Steve Jorgensen [mailto:jorgens AT coho DOT net] > >using tar -xvzf ... In all cases where a new directory was > > By the way the "-" is depreciated. tar zxvf (hey just how I type it) will > do. Uhm, no. The '-' and '--' usages are the correct ones. The '-'-free usage of tar is explicitely noted as "old option style" in the tar info file. GNU tar tries to be as compatible as possible so the old option style will be supported for at least forever or so. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/