Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B57083E.3AE6FB6E@lapo.it>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:18:07 +0200
From: Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Security of SSH
References: <NEBBKFFPHKAEKAIFNMBNGEODCPAA DOT sandhya DOT manmohan AT wipro DOT com> <20010717111517 DOT L25442 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > I want to know how secure is SSH on NT.
> As secure or insecure as on any other system. The insecurity of
> NT is not SSH related...

I bet he meant "SSH on CygWin is as secure as a NT application can be?" and
I think the answer is "of course" (right?).
Of course ather the system is completely compromised (and it happens
frequently, it seems ^_^) nothing is secure no more.

--
Lapo Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/