Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "ted byers" To: "'Billinghurst, David \(CRTS\)'" Cc: Subject: RE: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be seriously broken Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:13:48 -0400 Message-ID: <003901c11054$a618b960$f86be740@beak.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <8D00C32549556B4E977F81DBC24E985D1B1B72@crtsmail1.technol_exch.corp.riotinto.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Disposition-Notification-To: "ted byers" Thanks, I retrieved and installed dejagnu-1.4.1, and made the various edits recommended (before proceeding with the installation). I used the usual install procedure: ./configure make make install However, it had no effect on the g77 tests, except that they took about 50% longer to finish. Cheers, Ted -----Original Message----- From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS) [mailto:David DOT Billinghurst AT riotinto DOT com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 7:56 PM To: ted byers Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: RE: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be seriously broken I would recommend installing installing dejagnu-1.4.1 (which you need for libstdc++-v3) and fixing a line break problem http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/dejagnu/2001-May/000031.html I posted some stuff about this to the cygwin, dejagnu and cygwin lists earlier this year. Try searching google using "cygwin dejagnu g77 billinghurst" for some background. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU] > Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2001 8:24 > To: ted byers > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: building gcc/g++ seems OK but building g77 seems to be > seriously broken > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, ted byers wrote: > > > Well, I have now built GCC3 a couple times, trying to figure out what > has > > gone awry, but nothing seems to fix g77 (the summary given below show > why I > > think it is seriously broken). gcc and g++ seem to be OK since their > > respective test suites give the expected results (the number of > unexpected > > failures being extemely small). > > When you report gcc build problems, you really need to provide the flags > you passed to configure. Too many variables otherwise. > > > === g77 Summary === > > > > # of expected passes 281 > > # of unexpected failures 334 > > # of untested testcases 326 > > /home/Bted/Objects/gcc/g77 g77 version 3.0 (Fortran Frontend version > 0.5.26 > > 20010617 (experimental)) > > Probably a problem in the g77 tests, which passes the -lm, and that causes > a problem on Cygwin 1.1.x. > > Regards, > Mumit > > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/