Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010718114905.009f56a0@142.176.136.60>
X-Sender: john DOT doucette AT 142 DOT 176 DOT 136 DOT 60
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:58:40 -0300
To: mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk
From: John Daniel Doucette <john DOT doucette AT jjmackay DOT ca>
Subject: Re: setup.exe 2.78.2.3 local install problem; solution
In-Reply-To: <00cd01c10f92$40343650$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>
References: <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20010718102202 DOT 009f38b0 AT 142 DOT 176 DOT 136 DOT 60>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Thanks Michael Chase!

I WAS using setup.exe to download the setup.ini and 
packages.  However...  I had been maintaining a local directory of packages 
so that other people can install from a local directory rather than 
download all of the packages again over a slow modem.  I just keep a zipped 
up copy of the local package on a network drive.  With the old setup.exe, 
it was OK to delete the setup.ini, setup.log, and setup.log.full from the 
local directory before zipping it up to distribute to other people.  The 
old setup could tell that no packages were installed without refering to 
the setup.ini.  With the new setup.exe, you cannot delete the setup.ini 
(which I did!) that gets downloaded into the local directory.  I just ran 
setup.exe again to get another copy of setup.ini and every thing works 
fine.  I guess the rule of thumb is if you are maintaining a local copy of 
the packages to save download time, do not delete any seemingly extra files 
that setup.exe decides it wants to download!

At 2001_07_18 Wednesday 07:00 AM -07004, you wrote:
>You _really_ should use setup.exe to download setup.ini and the packages you
>are interested in.  The directory structure given in setup.ini is critical
>for setup.exe to properly find the eligible packages.
>
>David.
>   This is getting to be a FAQ.  The instructions given in
>http://cygwin.com/download.html seem to imply this is a reasonable way to
>download and install.  It would be better if the first method suggested was
>to let setup.exe do the downloading.  I wouldn't even mention manually
>downloading for normal installations.
>--
>Mac :})
>** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
>Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
>Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Daniel Doucette" <john DOT doucette AT jjmackay DOT ca>
>To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 06:22
>Subject: setup.exe 2.78.2.3 local install problem
>
>
> > I have currently cygwin 1.1.8 installed on my PC, package snap shot from
> > 2001.03.12, with setup 2.29.   I have downloaded to a local directory
> > cygwin 1.3.2-1, package snap shot as of 2001.07.18, which has setup.exe
> > 2.78.2.3.  I decided to upgrade to the cygwin 1.3.2-1 package so I ran
> > setup 2.78.2.3 from my local directory and selected "install from local
> > directory". When I do this the Cygwin Setup screen says "Nothing new to
> > install/update" underneath the "Current" column, and nothing under any of
> > the other columns.   I then tried manually deleting the old 1.1.8
> > installation by deleting all the cygwin directories, shortcuts, and all
> > cygwin/cgynus entries in the registry.  Then I rebooted and ran setup
> > 2.78.2.3 again.  I received the same message saying there was nothing new
> > to install/update.  I then backed up a few menus and tried to download
>from
> > internet, where it correctly showed that I had no packages at all
> > installed.  Is it safe to use my old setup 2.29 with the new package
> > set?  I have used 2.29 to reinstall the old 1.1.8 snapshot which worked
> > fine, but would still like to upgrade to 1.3.2.  I am running win98 2nd
>ed.
> > cygcheck output follows.  Thanks for any suggestions.


===================================
John Daniel Doucette, Sr. Software Designer

J. J. MacKay Canada Limited
Halifax R & D Office
1046 Barrington Street, 1st Floor
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada
B3H 2R1

Phone		902.423.7727  x222
Fax		902.422.8108
Web		www . jjmackay . ca
Email		john . doucette @ jjmackay . ca
===================================


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/