Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:28:46 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: broken CTRL-BREAK handling
Message-ID: <20010717162846.A11316@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE1CA2EF1 AT cpex3 DOT channelpoint DOT com> <20010717161453 DOT A11212 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010717161453.A11212@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:14:53PM -0400

On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:14:53PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 02:06:21PM -0600, Troy Noble wrote:
>>b20.1 handled it differently.  If I press the [X] or
>>CTRL-BREAK in a b20.1 window, JDK dutifully dumps the
>>stack trace.
>
>Hmm.  I'll have to investigate this next week.  I can't easily retrieve
>the B20 sources right now.

Ok.  I lied.  I can check this.  I reverted some sources to around the
B20 time frame.  AFAICT, my original assertion is true.  B20 should
have treated CTRL-BREAK as equivalent to CTRL-C.  If it didn't then
it sure appears to be a bug.  I can't figure out how CTRL-C could work
if CTRL-BREAK wasn't also working the same way.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/