Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:09:01 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: CYGWIN1.DLL Message-ID: <20010717120901.H9167@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010717143212 DOT B730 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010717152323 DOT F730 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3B544E79 DOT 50A10401 AT bestweb DOT net> <20010717111017 DOT E9167 AT redhat DOT com> <3B546188 DOT 38BB1D3E AT bestweb DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B546188.38BB1D3E@bestweb.net>; from jamesl@bestweb.net on Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:16PM -0400 On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:16PM -0400, James E. LaBarre wrote: >OK, I meant that the difference between Mingw & regular Cygwin is that >Mingw makes a simpler install for newbies, while using cygwin.dll, etc. >allows you to make use of all the other functionality of cygwin (bash, >command line utils, etc.). It's a tradeoff of what your intended target >is. It's not really a tradeoff if we are talking about linking a program. You seem to be confused between the concept of cygwin1.dll and the cygwin distribution. They are two different things. The original poster wanted to build an application that didn't rely on the Cygwin DLL. He wasn't talking about bash, command line utils, etc. I was trying to correct the impression that you seemed to be giving that it was possible to pick and choose cygwin pieces while linking a program. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/