Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B541B75.1FAD22E6@bestweb.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:03:17 -0400
From: "James E. LaBarre" <jamesl AT bestweb DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bug in pthread_cond_signal under Win NT 4.0
References: <ITDOMAIN002456UnHAa000000ec AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	 <00e201c10e40$103e51e0$806410ac AT local> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010716152233 DOT 01e4a168 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

If you insist that "reply-to" doesn't get used, then you have no right
to complain when replies don't get sent to the list.


Randall R Schulz wrote:
> 
> Wow! Synchronicity.
> 
> This just came up on the Macintosh Java Developers' list today.
> 
> Please read this, if you think the Reply-To business is a good idea ('cause
> it ain't):
>          <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>.
> 
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
> 
> At 15:12 2001-07-16, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> >Isn't there a way to get the CygWin mail lists to include the "Reply To"
> >field, so that this would automatically be done with most email apps?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/