Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: 15 Jul 2001 23:44:36 -0400
Message-ID: <20010716034436.23951.qmail@lizard.curl.com>
From: Jonathan Kamens <jik AT curl DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010715231552.A10472@redhat.com> (message from Christopher
	Faylor on Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:15:52 -0400)
Subject: Re: data in socketpair() channel lost if writer closes or exits without shutting down
References: <20010713181435 DOT 3695 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010713202146 DOT B11377 AT redhat DOT com> <20010716025220 DOT 23701 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010715231552 DOT A10472 AT redhat DOT com>

>  Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 23:15:52 -0400
>  From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>  
>  We don't have any mechanism for sharing file handle (or actually device)
>  state between processes.

Absent such a mechanism, I can't think of any way to fix this bug (or
perhaps I should say, to work around this Windows bug :-).

  jik

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/