Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010708171355.02c86118@pop-server.cfl.rr.com> X-Sender: psusi AT pop-server DOT cfl DOT rr DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:17:19 -0400 To: Corinna Vinschen From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: I can't find command su.exe In-Reply-To: <20010708194325.D8578@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <000201c1065d$c01ce990$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <0DAEDF148988D411BB980008C7E65D2E03A14C18 AT esealnt416> <000201c1065d$c01ce990$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed How is it worked out? If you just use LogonUser(), not only do you have to have the users password, but you also have to have the TCB privilege, which is silly. Unless you have a service that runs as system and accepts logon requests from clients, and gives them back the token? I was actually thinking of writing a replacement authentication dll that would punt to the standard one unless a special username syntax was entered, something like administrator!luser, and if the administrator password was correct, it would log on as luser. This would be nice because if you installed it on a domain controller, it would handle logon requests from all clients in the domain, for local and remote access, not just local. At 07:43 PM 7/8/2001 +0200, you wrote: >On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 08:13:26AM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Larsson (ERA)" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 01:00 > > Subject: RE: I can't find command su.exe > > > > > > > OK, so what's the differenses between cygwin su and any other *nix su? > > > > Currently there _isn't_ a Cygwin su and there can't be until some > issues get > > worked out about how to match the UNIX security model to WinNTs (very > > different) and Win9x (none). It is being worked on, but I wouldn't expect > > anything until summer is over. > >The issues are worked out as far as I can see. However, `su' would >still need some minor tweaking to support changing user context with >and without password and to solve an issue concerning environment >variables. I will probably not have the time to do that in the next >few weeks but I could give some advice if somebody volunteers. > >Corinna > >-- >Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to >Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >Red Hat, Inc. -->Phillip Susi psusi AT cfl DOT rr DOT com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/