Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:40:10 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Problem choosing exe entry point.
Message-ID: <20010706134010.A1110@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010705224456 DOT 2695E-100000 AT cse DOT cygnus DOT com> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010706121120 DOT 25225C-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010706121120.25225C-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:16:20PM -0500

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:16:20PM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote:
>On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Mo DeJong wrote:
>
>> Well, then how does one clear up the ambiguous set of symbols?
>> I would have thought passing (the default) -mconsole or -mwindows
>> would take care of that.
>
>I haven't really thought about it much, but you're right that we
>should deal with this scenario.
>
>I couldn't reproduce your problem, and then realized that my specs
>file does -u _WinMain AT 16 when it sees the -mwindows option. The joys
>of slightly divergent local tree. There must be a reason why I never
>submitted the change, the trick is to remember why.

It's funny, but I've been meaning to add that to the specs file for a
while but I keep forgetting.  I have a feeling that I might have
inadvertently dropped it somehow.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/