Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:11:37 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: I can't find command su.exe Message-ID: <20010705181137.A28285@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <50A89B19AEAAD411B9D200A0C9FB5699E88D85 AT craius DOT cportcorp DOT com> <3B44DE76 DOT 7000505 AT Interwoven DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3B44DE76.7000505@Interwoven.com>; from sandman@Interwoven.com on Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:39:02PM -0700 On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:39:02PM -0700, Sandeep Tamhankar wrote: >Hmm, I'm beginning to think my 1.3.2 didn't come with su after all. I >was upgrading from 1.1.8 when I got 1.3.2. When I do su --version, it >tells me "GNU sh-utils 1.16"...and the sh-utils package that came with >1.3.2 is v2.0-2...and doesn't contain an su executable. Maybe it came >with b20 and I just held onto it when I upgraded from b20 to 1.1.8. > >Anyway, the other message about the e-mail archive message that >elaborates on "it works not as you expect it to do" basically says use >"login" instead of su. Cygwin does not currently support su. If you have a version of su in your /bin directory, it came from an older version of sh-utils. Newer versions do not include it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/