Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <03e001c10421$e8fb4de0$806410ac@local> From: "Robert Collins" To: "James Grishaw" , References: <3B425A48 DOT D6A25F09 AT myrealbox DOT com> Subject: Re: inetd: how does one change the priority? Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:40:21 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2001 00:27:48.0696 (UTC) FILETIME=[273E8D80:01C10420] ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Grishaw" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:50 AM Subject: inetd: how does one change the priority? > Team, > > I am having a problem with poor performance with an imapd > daemon that I am running under Cygwin inetd. The symptoms are as follows: > (1) I can connect to the imapd server from any external box (other > than the server) and everything works fine. > (2) If I run Netscape on the server, I connect fine and all the commands > work, but the performance is horrible (up to 30 seconds to > open a mailbox, with CPU usage at 100% during the wait). > (3) If I use task manager to decrease the priority of the Netscape > process or increase the priority of the imapd processes, performance > is good again. > (4) This problem only occurs on Windows 2000. Windows NT works fine. > > I am surmising that Netscape is consuming all of the CPU while it > is waiting for a response from the starved imapd daemon. > > I am running inetd as a service. Is there a way to increase the priority > of the Cygwin inetd.exe process (and all of its children)? I will accept any clues. nice can do it, or you could wrap the imapd in a script with nice(). Personally I suggest patching inetd to make a call to nice() so that you won't be delayed while waiting for inted to spawn the child. You may need to call nice in the child as well - YMMV. Rob > > Many thanks, > Jim Grishaw. > > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/