Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010702073549.02331ec8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 07:38:44 -0700
To: russell christian sears <sears AT cis DOT ohio-state DOT edu>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
From: Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.3.2, 1.1.8: Pipelines losing data?  (Windows 2000)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0107020920330.29369-100000@beta.cis.ohio-sta
 te.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Russell,

I should have tested my hypothesis before sending. Apparently it is not 
correct. When its output is directed into a pipe, less does indeed forgo 
altering the input data.

All my mounts are binmode. Perhaps there's something going on with that?

Randall


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/