Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010701101003.034141f0@rufus.swip.net> X-Sender: mr58976 AT rufus DOT swip DOT net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 10:18:27 +0200 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Jens Yllman Subject: Symbolic links. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Hi, setup.exe uses the old symbolic links when it installs packages. Is this realy correct? Then I noticed some talk about .lnk here on the list. .lnk files created from windows may contain alot more information then a .lnk file created by cygwin as a symbolic link. I think that a .lnk file created by windows can not be treated as a symbolic link in cygwin. At least not in the archiving sence. You might say that why archive windows files with a UNIX tool? At the moment I'm spending alot of time trying to make may programs compile with both Borland C++, Visual C++ and gcc. And those project may contain .lnk files that are not symbolic links in the cygwin sence. And should be presesrved when archived. So using the .lnk for symbolic links may be a bad choose. Using a fileformat that can contain/handle more then one thing is not a good thing if used in a system for only one thing. These are just my thougts. I've not read through all the posts on this list. So I might state something that is already clear. Jens Yllman -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/