Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:33:31 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <1438-Sat30Jun2001093330+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com In-reply-to: <20010629165352.B8545@redhat.com> (message from Christopher Faylor on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:53:52 -0400) Subject: Re: gdb run < file Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20010626 DOT 234402 DOT 21347360 DOT Takaaki DOT Ota AT am DOT sony DOT com> <20010627025036 DOT B20160 AT redhat DOT com> <20010627 DOT 235700 DOT 01365880 DOT Takaaki DOT Ota AT am DOT sony DOT com> <20010628220602 DOT A3596 AT redhat DOT com> <2427-Fri29Jun2001101154+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010629165352 DOT B8545 AT redhat DOT com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:53:52 -0400 > From: Christopher Faylor > > Since Cygwin is supposed to emulate Windows, there shouldn't be much > difference between the way UNIX does it and the way Cygwin does it. If you can do that without losing features, then it's of course okay. But losing features in the name of greater Unix compatibility is IMHO a grave mistake. It will prevent many Windows users from using Cygwin tools as a development platform for Windows programs. Likewise, waiting indefinitely for the ``right'' solution to surface and in the meantime rejecting a less ``right'' but nevertheless clean solution, is also a mistake. However, this is not something to be discussed on the GDB list. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/