Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:00:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "shouted down", "shot down", apologies Message-ID: <20010628010033.B30710@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <03F4742D8225D21191EF00805FE62B9908E23ED9 AT aa-msg-01 DOT medstat DOT com> <20010627164651 DOT A24718 AT redhat DOT com> <20010627182605 DOT A25447 AT redhat DOT com> <20010627205132 DOT C26445 AT redhat DOT com> <00de01c0ff80$6ad562c0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <00de01c0ff80$6ad562c0$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>; from mchase@ix.netcom.com on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:05:03PM -0700 On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:05:03PM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christopher Faylor" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 17:51 >Subject: Re: "shouted down", "shot down", apologies > > >> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:32:52PM -0400, Brian Keener wrote: >> >Just some step by step instructions - sometimes it's better to be over >> >detailed than to leave information out. I can always skip what I >> >already know - but if it's not there I have to ask someone. >> >> Yes. That's why I'm probably not the best person to be writing the >> instructions. > >That's one of the areas I'd like to contribute in, once my company's >disclaimer shakes loose. It will be quite a while before I'm comfortable >with gdb or the other troubleshooting tools. > >> One thing that happens is that occasionally the "powers that be" decide >> to make a change in the top-level configure and make process and this >> screws up cygwin. I usually live only in the winsup directory and do >> all of my builds there. It is safer. > >On the other hand, until some poor schmuck does build from the top level, >the problem goes undetected. Not for long. Someone from Red Hat will invariably find it. I probably build from the top level once a week or so, too. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/