Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010627.134213.03435018.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: "shouted down", "shot down", apologies From: Tak Ota In-Reply-To: <20010627161630.A23524@redhat.com> References: <20010627161630 DOT A23524 AT redhat DOT com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b126 on Emacs 21.0.103.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Telephone: +1-858-942-3239 X-Fax------: +1-858-942-9142 X-SnailMail: 16450 West Bernardo Drive MZ7205, San Diego, CA 92127-1804 Organization: Sony Electronics Inc. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Applause... I've been quietly observing the arguments with some nervous feeling. I now feel much better as being a part of this list. -Tak On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:16:30 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I have been concerned by two recent messages where people have felt > that their ideas have been "shouted down" or "shot down". > > That bothers me. It bothers me because I assume that most, if not > all of the negative perception undoubtedly came from me. > > I do have some strong opinions on how some things should be done. For > instance, I think that overloading a FAQ with excessive information is > counter productive. > > I also feel that the majority of "newbie" requests here do not come from > people who have exhaustively studied available documentation. > > So, filling the FAQ with non-frequently asked questions does not seem like > the way to go to me. It seems like it will make the FAQ harder to navigate > and will make it easier for people to miss things. > > Telling people that the way to use google is to type something like: > > http://www.google.com/search?q=cygwin+ssh&btnG=Google+Search > > does not make sense to me. > > Updating the documentation *does* make sense to me. > > Some recent email of mine may have made it sound like I am an inflexible > bastard. I regret sending it. > > I'm open to new ideas but I sometimes need to be convinced. And, even > when convinced, it does not necessarily follow that I will now make > it my life's mission to carry out the new ideas. > > I've said that repetition is important, so I'll repeat it one more time: > If you want to see something change, don't "suggest". Don't "it seems > to me". Don't "It would be nice". > > Please reorient your thinking from "This is what they should do" to > "This is what I can do". > > If I have dropped the ball on someone volunteering or if I have rudely > shot down your offer to help then I sincerely apologize. I know that > my attempts at humor have sometimes been interpreted as rudeness. I > know that sometimes I get impatient with ignorance (you can ask my > family about this trait), especially intractable ignorance. > > Regardless, I have no real excuse. I am sometimes exasperated and mean. > I hope that it is clear that I am doing what I'm doing because I want to > help. In some cases, I'm even doing things that I come close to > detesting, like maintaining gcc or make. I do this because I know that > it is important to people even though it is really not my specialty. > > And, I also enjoy running a project like Cygwin. I think that the net > release of Cygwin has improved dramatically in the last couple of years. > That is because I've lobbied for changes inside of Red Hat and solicited > active maintainers outside of Red Hat. And, I've encouraged the > development of the cygwin installer. > > There is still lots and lots and lots^10 of room for improvement. I > would like to improve the documentation. I would really like to expand > the cygwin test suite. There are still problems with cygwin signals > and the cygwin spawn command. setup.exe could stand all sorts of > improvement. > > I actually have a tendency to just see all of the negatives in cygwin. > I have to keep reminding myself that people are using it successfully > every day. Most of them don't care that zip stores full MS-DOS paths > or that spawn(_P_NOWAIT) doesn't work on non-cygwin programs. > > Anyway, if someone has volunteered and I have dropped the ball, please > ping me again. I'll try to rectify my mistake in not acting on your > offer. > > If someone has suggested an idea and didn't appreciate my response, > then I also apologize. I'll try to do better in the future. > > (Although, I will probably still try to be "humorous" from time to > time. Be warned.) > > cgf > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/