Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010627115157.021d5ce8@imap.coe.utah.edu> X-Sender: jordan AT imap DOT coe DOT utah DOT edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:54:28 -0600 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Bret Jordan Subject: Re: documentation & dear love In-Reply-To: <20010627132726.G22088@redhat.com> References: <3B3A07A7 DOT 3000601 AT dufair DOT org> <3B391600 DOT 6080408 AT gruntose DOT com> <20010627021651 DOT N19058 AT redhat DOT com> <3B3A07A7 DOT 3000601 AT dufair DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed This may be way out there. But I think there are a lot of us that just want to use some of the Unix tools in our native Windows environment. (Your group #2 from some past message). I would like to see a place in the documentation that talks about the issues we face. I know I have to end up writing my own so that I do not forget what I had to do to get something to work. I am sure other people are in this same boat. And it would be nice to not have to re-invent the wheel every time. If this is to far out of the scope for a request then I apologize up front. Bret At 01:27 PM 6/27/2001 -0400, you wrote: >On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:19:51AM -0500, Jason Dufair wrote: > >>However, I can see that the documentation could be misconstrued. > >>Cygwin's documentation is not perfect. I don't know of any project > >>which has perfect documentation. I would dearly love to have someone > >>actively working on it. > >> > >I'll step up and volunteer to work on documentation. I've been building > >up to working on coding (getting cygwin and the tools to compile for a > >start) since I'm a hacker first, but I am aware that too many open > >source projects are in dire need of documentatation and I'm getting > >sufficient number of technical challenges at work at this point. > > > >Unless you prefer to have more people writing code, of course. > > Christopher (or anyone), can you give me a ballpark idea of what needs > >to be done and where I might start? I've spent a fair amount of time > >under the "Contributing" link, but it seems mostly to be about writing > >code. Should I look at updating the user's guide? The FAQ? I've been > >using cygwin since about b17 and have been on and off the list, so I > >think I'm fairly qualified to help with the docs. And I'll certainly > >consult the list or whomever I should consult about suggested updates > >and changes. > >I'd appreciate contributions to whatever you find most interesting. > >We have a FAQ maintainer but I'm sure he'd appreciate specific words or >improvements. > >The docs need a lot of work (as always), so if you are so inclined, I >would appreciate updates there. I actually haven't looked at them in a >while so I don't know how much rot they have suffered. It is obvious >that the philosophy section should be beefed up. > >The docs and the FAQ are all under CVS control. Maybe we need a >"Contributing docs" link which talks about how to modify the >documentation? > >cgf > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bret Jordan Dean's Office LAN Manager College of Engineering 801.585.3765 University of Utah jordan AT coe DOT utah DOT edu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/