Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010627080855.026ff468@pop3.cris.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:11:23 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not want private email about cygwin) In-Reply-To: <20010627022323.O19058@redhat.com> References: <3B392A12 DOT 9C656CF7 AT etr-usa DOT com> <3B375E40 DOT 1000304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010625101924 DOT C9771 AT redhat DOT com> <20010625111149 DOT B1176 AT pinksheets DOT com> <3B375E40 DOT 1000304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010625133536 DOT A1280 AT pinksheets DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010625140310 DOT 0209d5c8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20010625154753 DOT A804 AT pinksheets DOT com> <20010625170532 DOT A13721 AT redhat DOT com> <3B392A12 DOT 9C656CF7 AT etr-usa DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Vocabulary check... At 23:23 2001-06-26, Christopher Faylor wrote: >... > >Ah yes, another "should be". Sigh. > >It doesn't matter how complete you make a FAQ. There will always be >people who can't assimilate information unless they've engaged in a long >torturous dialog. The FAQ can *never* have every single answer to every >single question. "Torturous" or "tortuous?" Both? >... > >cgf Randall -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/