Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B39673A.627AC7AC@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:55:22 -0400
From: Greg Smith <gsmith AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: pthreads works, sorta
References: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F09F AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3B396607 DOT CBFC6D33 AT nc DOT rr DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ummm, no   ;-)   Performance is now on pretty even keel with
with the Pthread-win32  implementation.  This is where our
`rogue' developer is claiming to reduce elapsed times
25% to match the elapsed times on linux.

Most of the users of our application (by it's nature)
are computer professionals and notice (ie whine) about things
like this.  (See http://www.conmicro.cx/hercules/).

So now we are at the point where we can start shaving off seconds ;-)

Greg

>
> I presume this win32-pthread like performance is "good enough" ?
>
> Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/