Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B392A12.9C656CF7@etr-usa.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:34:26 -0600 From: Warren Young Organization: -ENOENT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not want private email about cygwin) References: <3B375E40 DOT 1000304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010625101924 DOT C9771 AT redhat DOT com> <20010625111149 DOT B1176 AT pinksheets DOT com> <3B375E40 DOT 1000304 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010625133536 DOT A1280 AT pinksheets DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010625140310 DOT 0209d5c8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20010625154753 DOT A804 AT pinksheets DOT com> <20010625170532 DOT A13721 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I'll agree with Larry, though, that I find messages which have actual > information in them like "I searched the FAQ" to be refreshing. It cuts > down on the "Check the FAQ" "I already checked the FAQ!!!" type of > interchanges. The FAQ should be complete enough that you can tell simply from reading the question wether they've read the FAQ or not. Exchanges like your hypothetical one only happen when the FAQ gives ambiguous or incomplete answers. -- = Warren -- Video articles: http://www.cyberport.com/~tangent/video/ = = ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/