Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:58:45 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: pthreads works, sorta Message-ID: <20010625215845.B3519@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3B37D1A6 DOT 39A2685 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> <03c701c0fdd7$82ddbde0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <03c701c0fdd7$82ddbde0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:32:41AM +1000 On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 10:32:41AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> I also know that Rob is fully aware of the performance problem and >> has ideas he wishes to implement, when he can spare some moments of >his >> valuable time. However, as of 1.3, our application doesn't run on >Win32 >> without kluging the threads implementation (by using a pthreads >implementation >> from ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/pthreads-win32). I am anxious to >see >> pthreads `right' on Cygwin. > >I cannot read that implementation unfortunately - cygwin1.dll >contributes require copyright assignment. However if someone is >willing/able to give me relatively details english differences between >their mature implementation and the cygwin1.dll one, I'm more than happy >to recode what cygwin's got. There should be no problem with looking at that implementation. It was partially developed on Cygnus's dime. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/