Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:12:28 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Blunt Tools (was: cgf does not want private email about cygwi n) Message-ID: <20010625171228.B13721@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from gcoakley@mqsoftware.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:01:14PM -0500 On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:01:14PM -0500, Glen Coakley wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >>>Someone was asking about examples, so here's one. A few days ago, the >>>Debian guy wrote about "porting" Debian to Cygwin and gets a one-liner >>>back suggesting he knows nothing about either Debian or Cygwin. He's >>>got a Debian email address, and even to someone like myself, who has >>>never used Debian, it's obvious that's he's just been imprecise in his >>>phrasing. What Debian really brings to the table is its packaging >>>system, and he's probably talking about that. >> >>Actually, if this is the "Cygwin + Debian" mail, then the original >>poster did not have a @debian.org address. > >The Reply-To address was @debian.org but the From address was @mit.edu. >Inprecision abounds. It is very easy to do when reading and typing >quickly. Thanks for clarifying. I missed that, obviously. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple