Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <001c01c0fd28$b8f30f70$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>
From: "Michael A. Chase" <mchase AT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
To: "Soren Andersen" <soren AT wonderstorm DOT com>, <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <000501c0fd22$e62873a0$5bab313f AT sigmund>
Subject: Re: cp error -- oh the great sanity of *nix tools?!?
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:38:21 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

One advantage with open-source over Redmond's finest is that you can always
find the error message in the source code and submit a patch with a better
message.  I believe cp is in the fileutils package.

I vaguely recall similar problems being discussed in this list a couple
weeks ago.  A Google search will probably find them.
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Soren Andersen" <soren AT wonderstorm DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 19:58
Subject: cp error -- oh the great sanity of *nix tools?!?


> Dogma: GNU/*nix  programming is *always* so much better than what Redmond
> can produce. Yeah, like.
>
> I am running a Makefile installation (`make install') and I keep getting
> this error (the package is BerkeleyDB, this is irrelevent):
>
>
> ./db_checkpoint -> /usr/sbin/db_checkpoint
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_checkpoint' and `/usr/sbin/db_checkpoint' are the same
> file
> ./db_deadlock -> /usr/sbin/db_deadlock
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_deadlock' and `/usr/sbin/db_deadlock' are the same file
> ./db_dump -> /usr/sbin/db_dump
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_dump' and `/usr/sbin/db_dump' are the same file
> ./db_load -> /usr/sbin/db_load
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_load' and `/usr/sbin/db_load' are the same file
> ./db_printlog -> /usr/sbin/db_printlog
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_printlog' and `/usr/sbin/db_printlog' are the same file
> ./db_recover -> /usr/sbin/db_recover
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_recover' and `/usr/sbin/db_recover' are the same file
> ./db_stat -> /usr/sbin/db_stat
> /usr/bin/cp: `./db_stat' and `/usr/sbin/db_stat' are the same file
> make: *** [install] Error 1
>
> You know, the hacker who wrote `cp' to give this error wording needs to be
> put up against a wall and *shot*.
>
> What does this mean? I am sure that this is "one of those things" that
> everybody but me and two guys in Duluth seem to know.
>
> REALLY F*%$!)($! IRRITATED,



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple