Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B33815D.4020600@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:33:17 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: setfacl BUG [Was: Re: ssh private key permissions] References: <3B311D93 DOT 20902 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010622002754 DOT D1830 AT cobold DOT toronto DOT redhat DOT com> <3B329608 DOT 7010709 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20010622191531 DOT B1647 AT cobold DOT toronto DOT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>What gives? I do NOT understand ACLs. >> > > Hmm, obviously `setfacl' doesn't understand ACLs as well... > Thank god we have the sourcecode in the utils subdir. Ah. So the observed behavior *IS* incorrect. I thought setfacl was performing "correctly" and I just didn't understand it. Okay. But the problem, I think, lies in winsup/cygwin/sec_acl.cc, not winsup/utils/setfacl.c. But that's just a hunch. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple