Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:39:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Where do I send bug reports? Message-ID: <20010622103929.J13746@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from bkeener@thesoftwaresource.com on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:25:18AM -0400 On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:25:18AM -0400, Brian Keener wrote: >Patrick Hubers wrote: >> Copied setup.exe and the latest and contrib >> directories to my laptop and ran setup. No package names. I then copied >> setup.ini (from my other machine) also to my laptop and then setup *did* >> show me package names. > >This is not a bug but was a side affect of previous changes made that was still >existent in 2.57. Setup did/does requires setup.ini. The more recent version >from CVS that Chris and Robert have been working on so heavily doesn't have >that requirement and will now find all packages in the directory - even without >a setup.ini, I don't think I changed this (yet). The current version does require a setup.ini as the key for what should be installed. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple