Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010620161007.04be99e0@mail> X-Sender: superbiskit AT mail X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:11:40 -0400 To: "Tim Peters" , "DJ Delorie" , From: "David A. Cobb" Subject: RE: Cygwin Python Distribution GPL Licensing Issue? Cc: , In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed So . . . Does it build OOTB in Cygwin? Presumably the Linux sources. I looked at www.python.org and there's no mention of Cygwin as a platform. At 6/16/01 04:01 PM (Saturday), Tim Peters wrote: >Briefly following up on a thread here from the end of April: the FSF and >PSF (Python Software Foundation) reached an unexpected (but exceedingly >welcome) agreement on the Python licensing situation wrt the GPL. We'll be >releasing new versions of Python primarily to get the new license out there, >but also with accumulated bugfixes since their original releases: > > 2.0.1 2.0 + bugfixes + new license. Release candidate already > available, and final release scheduled for the coming week. > > 2.1.1 2.1 + bugfixes + new license. Partly depends on volunteer > time; range of 2 to 4 weeks is my best guess. > >all's-well-that-ends-ly y'rs - tim > >-----Original Message----- >From: python-list-admin AT python DOT org [mailto:python-list-admin AT python DOT org] > On Behalf Of Guido van Rossum [mailto:guido AT digicool DOT com] >Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 11:46 AM >To: python-dev AT python DOT org >Cc: python-list AT python DOT org >Subject: 2.0.1's GPL-compatibility is official! > > >Richard Stallman, Eben Moglen and the FSF agree: Python 2.0.1 is >compatible with the GPL. They've updated the text about the Python >license on http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html, stating in >particular: > > GPL-Compatible, Free Software Licenses > > [...] > > The License of Python 1.6a2 and earlier versions. > This is a free software license and is compatible with the > GNU GPL. Please note, however, that newer versions of Python > are under other licenses (see below). > The License of Python 2.0.1, 2.1.1, and newer versions. > This is a free software license and is compatible with the > GNU GPL. Please note, however, that intermediate versions of > Python (1.6b1, through 2.0 and 2.1) are under a different > license (see below). > >I would like to emphasize and clarify (again!) that Python is *not* >released under the GPL, so if you think the GPL is a bad thing, you >don't have to worry about Python being contaminated. > >The GPL compatibility is important for folks who distribute Python >binaries: e.g. the new license makes it okay to release Python >binaries linked with GNU readline and other GPL-covered libraries. > >We'll release the final release of 2.0.1 within a week; so far we've >had only one bug reported in the release candidate. > >I expect that we won't have to wait long for 2.1.1, which will have >the same GPL-compatible license as 2.0.1. > >--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) > >-- >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > >-- >Want to unsubscribe from this list? >Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate, All around nice guy. Get my PGP key at : Fingerprint=0x{6E3E_DB8C_2E8C_4248_62B2_FE29_08EE_CF0A_3629_E954} "By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." --The Way of a Pilgrim, R. M. French [tr.] <---.----!----.----!----.----!----.----!----.----!----.----!----.----> -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple