Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:38:47 -0700
From: Enoch Wu <ewu AT eskimo DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Help! I Can't run vim.exe on NT 4.0 ssh'ed in to NT
Message-ID: <20010615223846.A3826449@MELON>
Reply-To: Enoch Wu <ewu AT eskimo DOT com>
Mail-Followup-To: Enoch Wu <ewu AT eskimo DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <11 DOT 15d610ba DOT 285c3135 AT cs DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <11.15d610ba.285c3135@cs.com>; from Shapirod112@cs.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:49:09PM -0400
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i <http://www.mutt.org>
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_98-4.10 1.3.2(0.39/3/2) i586<http://www.cygwin.com>
X-Sender: ewu AT eskimo DOT com

Hi

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:49:09PM -0400, Shapirod112 AT cs DOT com wrote:
> hello,
> 
> I have set up sshd on NT 4.0 and I can get into the system now.  
> Unfortunately, when I run vim.exe, the term is messed up or something.  I can 
> not scroll  past the 11 or so lines I see on the screen.  When I scroll down 
> and change a line it turns out I am on a line completely different then the 
> one I thought I was on.  I tried set TERM=cygwin, set TERM=vt100, set 
> TERM=ansi.  vim.exe does not seem to have a TERM option of vt100 and defaults 
> to ansi.  

Joe editor has JOETERM as environment variable.

> I really want to edit files.  What am I doing wrong?  What 
> environment setting is not right?  I have tried set CYGWIN=tty.  I read 
> through the archives searching on vim, environment, TERM, but I have not 
> found the answer.  I even went to vim home page too to look around.  Please 
> help.  Ah, well, cygwin was recently download, so I guess I have the latest 
> stuff.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> david

In theory, vim is the editor for every programmer and sys admin. In practice
I find that joe editor works well when vim stumbles. I can't explain why joe
is so robust. I don't believe in one editor for all applications. I use vim
when joe fails and vice versa. BUT I am not an editor guru so please pardon me
if I have the wrong perception about either editor.

EW 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple