Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:27:31 -0400 Message-Id: <200106080127.VAA01308@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, gdb AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Another RFC: regex in libiberty [More lists added to get a wider audience] I didn't get a clear feeling about what people wanted wrt this. I saw three people propose three versions of regex, not much to go on. Is this a big deal? Will it really get used by everyone who currently has their own regex? Is it important to try to use a BSD-licensed regex to minimize future problems? The two contenders seem to be a modified GNU regex and the ever-popular Henry Spencer's regex. Does anyone have any strong opinions for either of these, or against any regex in libiberty at all? -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple