Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: From: Heribert Dahms To: "'SaurabhMisra AT Agere DOT com'" , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: RE: Cygwin 128MB Registry Hack Fix - Is there a UPPER Limit? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:50:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Hi Saurabh, the registry setting is heap_chunk_in_mb and 0x1010 is 4096+16, so you obviously (haven't tried nor read the sources) overflow 32bit and effectively get only 16MB! Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de) > -----Original Message----- > From: Saurabh Misra [SMTP:saurabhmisra AT lucent DOT com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 23:25 > To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com > Subject: Cygwin 128MB Registry Hack Fix - Is there a UPPER Limit? > > > > > I read the tip on how to get a "GCC-Under-Cygwin" compiled program to be > able to malloc more than 128MB. I tried successfully setting the > value to 1GB (1024), but after that, it seems the next value that worked > was approx 4GB (Hex 1010). But I could not get any value in between to > work - if I tried it (for example, 2048), upon trying to open a cygwin > terminal (a bash terminal), it would immediately quit fatally. > > Is there a particular piece of information I am missing? > > Thanks. > Saurabh. > > << File: Card for Saurabh Misra >> << File: ATT19389.txt >> -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple