Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:31:17 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: jashoemaker AT pinksheets DOT com
Subject: Re: bug in binutils-20010425-2 tarball
Message-ID: <20010604103117.C9250@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, jashoemaker AT pinksheets DOT com
References: <NEBBIILHBFCCLODBLECCOEGOAPAB DOT jashoemaker AT pinksheets DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <NEBBIILHBFCCLODBLECCOEGOAPAB.jashoemaker@pinksheets.com>; from jashoemaker@pinksheets.com on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:10:48AM -0400

On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:10:48AM -0400, John A. Shoemaker wrote:
>The binutils-20010425-2 tarball contains the wrong version of ld. When you
>try to compile with gcc, it throws an error regarding the dll-search-prefix
>switch. I downloaded the binutils-20010425-1 tarball and it didn't have this
>problem.

So, your theory is that the "ld" package, released more than a month ago, and
used by everyone who uses gcc is broken and you are the first person to notice?

Or are you supplying some special options to gcc/ld which lead you to be
convinced of this?

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple