Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B1AA6B2.FD3D556E@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 17:05:54 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl M CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xpm-4.0.0-2 and xpm-nox-4.0.3-1 question References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Karl M wrote: > > Hi All... > > I noticed that xpm-4.0.0-2.tar.gz is now in the xpm-nox directory when I > download. If I not compiled with any xpm references, do I need it? No, you don't need it. I've removed it from the xpm-nox directory; it seems the script that runs on sourceware to autogenerate the setup.ini file does *not* ignore tarballs with the "wrong" name, as I thought it would. (Seems obvious in retrospect, but...) Once we figure out where obsolete (but possibly necessary) stuff should go on sourceware, so that setup.ini doesn't include it, I'll put xpm-4.0.0-2 there. > Also, in > the xpm-nox directory would it be better to have only the new stuff? yes. --Chuck -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple