Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:46:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC toolchain
Message-ID: <20010601214652.A7408@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 33 DOT 0106011927260 DOT 10840-100000 AT cobra DOT nmt DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106011927260.10840-100000@cobra.nmt.edu>; from elessar@nmt.edu on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:35:41PM -0600

On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:35:41PM -0600, Thomee Wright wrote:
>In the current latest release on the FTP servers, the version of cpp
>included in the GCC toolchain doesn't have the remap option compiled in,
>although earlier versions did.  Was this a considered change, an arbitrary
>decision, or an oversight?  If it was decided to make to make this change,
>why was it?

There was no decision and I'm not sure how there could be an oversight.
It's just a standard configure/make/make install.

If you would like to investigate further and figure out why it isn't working,
I'd be happy to turn it on.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple