Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Originating-IP: [212.37.202.20] From: "piotr cygwin" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ntsec or not ? [Was: Default user accounts ?] Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 14:07:02 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2001 14:07:03.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[21F515A0:01C0EAA4] From: Corinna Vinschen >ntsec is useless with FAT, except if you want to use different accounts. >However, I don't understand the decision to use FAT. NTFS is more >reliable and faster. On big partitions you're losing disk space using FAT >due to the big blocksize. > It was not my choice, but our administrator's :-) . I Guess it was simpler to manage in a mixed Win95/WinNT environment. Moreover, I was quite happy with FAT, since NTFS support of Linux (which is also installed on the PC) was until recently not fully reliable. > > Also: I try to rlogin from cygwin to a remote Unix machine. I've added >an > > entry in the .rhost file of the remote machine: > > > > but I'm still prompted with the password. Is it also an ntsec issue ? > >No, the permissions of your .rhosts file have to be 0600. > it _is_ 0600 (and it works fine when I try to rlogin from machines other than cygwin...) Pierre _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple