Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:06:18 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: ntsec or not ? [Was: Default user accounts ?] Message-ID: <20010601130618.A603@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from piotr_cygwin@hotmail.com on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:51:47AM -0000 On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 09:51:47AM -0000, piotr cygwin wrote: > I need also some advice from your experience: as I said, I run WinNT4, but > still with FAT filesystems, and I wonder if I should enable or not ntsec ? I > mean: personnaly I don't really mind about ownership and permissions of > files and processes, but I plan to install and compile various applications, > and maybe some developement tools are sensitive these points. Your opinion ? ntsec is useless with FAT, except if you want to use different accounts. However, I don't understand the decision to use FAT. NTFS is more reliable and faster. On big partitions you're losing disk space using FAT due to the big blocksize. > Also: I try to rlogin from cygwin to a remote Unix machine. I've added an > entry in the .rhost file of the remote machine: > > but I'm still prompted with the password. Is it also an ntsec issue ? No, the permissions of your .rhosts file have to be 0600. > [BTW: is it possible to rlogin to cygwin from another machine ?] Sure. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple