Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Originating-IP: [216.135.220.54] From: "Karl M" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: perl mutt automake and question Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:42:58 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 May 2001 17:42:59.0218 (UTC) FILETIME=[F78AD720:01C0E92F] Reposting under a new heading >From: "Charles S. Wilson" >To: Karl M >CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >Subject: Re: setup 2.57 question >Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:58:41 -0400 > >Karl M wrote: > > > > Hi All... > > > > When I use the new setup (very nice now), I have one >question...automake, > > mutt, ncftp, perl, popt and wget don't get installed, but they used to. >It > > looks like they are labeled as experimental--is that the correct > > classification? > >Well, "correct" is a relative term... > >Currently, the ncftp, popt, and wget directories contain only a single >version, and that version is labeled experimental. That means that they >will not get installed (or displayed) by default. You have to click on >the "Exp" radio button, and then they will show up, and then you can >install them. > >However, I suppose it's time to remove the experimental tag -- I haven't >received any complaints about the behavior of those three >packages. I just forgot to mark them "current" once my self-imposed >"beta-test" period ended. > >I dunno about perl, mutt, or automake; those aren't "my" packages. > >--Chuck _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple