Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:23:49 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: UNIX-socket problems under cygwin 1.3.2
Message-ID: <20010529122349.D4844@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1888116520 DOT 20010529164542 AT logos-m DOT ru> <001a01c0e843$2a354180$6e032bb7 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <001a01c0e843$2a354180$6e032bb7@BRAMSCHE>; from Ralf.Habacker@saght.tessag.com on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:27:53PM +0200

On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:27:53PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>
>
>Ralf Habacker
>EMail: Ralf AT habacker DOT de
>       Ralf DOT Habacker AT saght DOT tessag DOT com
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: egor duda [mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru]
>> Gesendet am: Dienstag, 29. Mai 2001 14:46
>> An: Ralf Habacker
>> Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>> Betreff: Re: UNIX-socket problems under cygwin 1.3.2
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Tuesday, 29 May, 2001 Ralf Habacker Ralf DOT Habacker AT saght DOT tessag DOT com wrote:
>>
>> RH> I have figured out another problem on cygwin 1.3.2. On ported
>> kde 1.1.2 unix
>> RH> sockets doesn't work right. The function accept() returns an
>> error. Starting
>> RH> this application under cygwin 1.1.8-2 it works. Starting the
>> app with strace
>> RH> or gdb works.
>>
>> RH> Does anyone have some hints ?
>>
>> if you'd be more specific of what error accept() returns, or tell when
>> it returns an error -- when called, or on incoming connection, or even
>> (gasp) provide a testcase, someone surely may help.
>>
>
>
>> AF_UNIX socket code had been changed since 1.1.8, but so far there were no
>> known ill effects of those changes.

http://cygwin.com/bugs.html

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple