Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 12:22:47 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.3.2, w32api-20010520 Message-ID: <20010529122247.C4844@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010522160031 DOT C19354 AT redhat DOT com> <000701c0e849$00a2cda0$21c9ca95 AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <000701c0e849$00a2cda0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>; from Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:09:40PM +0400 On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:09:40PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:10:03PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >> >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >>On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:53:28PM +0400, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >> >> >> >>>This release fixed a problem we had with zsh tests that were using pty. >> >>>Thank you. >> >>> >> >> >> >>Huh. Interesting. Was this the problem with O_NOCTTY? I am surprised >> >>that this would actually work correctly. >> >> >> > >> > >> >No. O_NOCTTY was internally fixed by not using it on Cygwin :-) >> >> Oh. Ok. I still plan on investigating this behavior at some point. It >> would be interesting to see if there was any difference in behavior if >> you reinstated the O_NOCTTY test because there is now code in cygwin >> that makes an attempt to do the right thing although I'm not sure that >> it is 100% correct. >> > >No, it is the same. Processes are still started without ctty: Oh well. Thanks for checking. I'll have to dig into it further, I guess. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple