Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 16:04:54 EDT To: Travis Howell , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin Setup 2.54 X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va Message-Id: From: Brian Keener Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com In-Reply-To: <001801c0e5e8$5e9880c0$562fa4cb@brasd1.vic.optushome.com.au> References: <000901c0e5e3$779404a0$562fa4cb AT brasd1 DOT vic DOT optushome DOT com DOT au> <001801c0e5e8$5e9880c0$562fa4cb AT brasd1 DOT vic DOT optushome DOT com DOT au> Travis, Are these clean installs that you are doing or are you upgrading an existing installation. Also if you are upgrading are you making sure the packages you do not want to instal are set to 'keep'. Really need to know if this is a new install or and upgrade to pursue this further. Chris - I haven't looked yet (and only ask because at first thought I thought of the change we made for the cygpath and the mount points and was thinking of the executable 'cygpath' as opposed to a function in setup) but the change you made for the mounts where it uses cygpath to determine file paths and the mount points would that be affected by new installs versus an upgrade. bk -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple