Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010526100626.026b8160@ks.teknowledge.com> X-Sender: rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 11:16:00 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Randall R Schulz Subject: Re: About Cygwin 1.0 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Just when you think you've heard it all... Maybe the writer meant "immortal" instead of "immoral?" Randall Schulz Mountain View, CA USA At 09:25 2001-05-26, you wrote: >Hello! > >Thank you for the free Cygwin software. One thing I'd like to talk about: >I was surprised to find no information on your pages (especially FAQ) >about the reasons why you have not released the stable Cygwin 1.0 >via the net. > Is it that you want people to use the unstable versions in order >to hasten the development of future versions (by their bug reports)? >In the spirit of the Gnu Public Licence, that would seem immoral to me. >If the public develops the software (under GPL) with their contributions, >they should also be allowed to enjoy the fruits (and not be constrained to >keep toiling with bugs when a stable version exists). > So please, let me know the true reasons why Cygwin 1.0 is not >distributed on the net. > > If people could more readily use stable versions in their developments, >perhaps Cygwin's reputation would improve (as it pertains to reliability). > >I thank you and I wish you success with your Cygwin affairs. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple