Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 22:37:32 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: CygWin file access puzzle
Message-ID: <20010523223732.A30572@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <F104Ppt8MduuJNc3JPv00002fb4 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <F104Ppt8MduuJNc3JPv00002fb4@hotmail.com>; from karlm30@hotmail.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:14:16PM -0700

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:14:16PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>Thanks, but now back to my question...in other installations on win2k
>machines, things worked just fine if I did nothing to the cygwin
>variable (just accepted the defaults).  Later, when I set CYGWIN=tty
>ntsec, then I got the added features.
>
>But now...I had this problem, and because of one of the replies I got,
>I set the CYGWIN=tty ntsec ntea binmode title case_check:strict, as an
>experiment.  the ls command then worked correctly.
>
>So...I'm puzzled as to why this fixed it.

If I was a betting man, I would be willing to be a large sum that the
above didn't fix anything.

The evidence points to another, non-cygwin version of ls on your
computer.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple