Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere To: Corinna Vinschen Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 23:25:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: inetutils-1.3.2-13 Reply-to: gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de Message-ID: <3B0C46FA.24739.299EA894@localhost> In-reply-to: <20010523104208.O10118@cygbert.vinschen.de> References: <3B0AF4D4 DOT 8719 DOT 2475C4F1 AT localhost>; from gerrit DOT haase AT t-online DOT de on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:23:00PM +0200 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12cDE) X-Hops: 1 X-Sender: 320081107336-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net Corinna Vinschen schrieb am 2001-05-23, 10:42: > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:23:00PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen schrieb am 2001-05-22, 10:47: > > > > > I've updated the version of inetutils in cygwin/latest to 1.3.2-13. > > > > I will never understand all this... > > I think, I do. It's probably my fault. > > > And why am I SYSTEM now? > > Are you using ntsec? If not, could you set CYGWIN to contain ntsec > for inetd and look if that changes things for you? Yes, sure am I using ntsec, as systemwide Variable and also in cygwin.bat: 1: inetd got no TTY: $ ps -e PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND 433 1 433 433 1 500 22:33:33 /usr/bin/bash 390 433 390 532 1 500 22:39:19 /usr/local/bin/perl 284 1 284 284 0 500 22:54:14 /usr/bin/bash 528 1 528 528 ? 18 22:55:03 /usr/sbin/inetd 242 528 528 242 ? 18 22:55:15 /usr/sbin/inetd 481 284 481 412 0 500 22:55:21 /usr/bin/ps 2: it is UID 18 3: CYGWIN is: $ set [...] CYGWIN=$'binmode tty ntea ntsec title case_check:strict' [...] 4: After login with telnet, i'm User SYSTEM, BASH=/bin/sh and NO CYGWIN at all, login to ftpd fails (failed not before upgrade). I don't use rsh so i don't know if it is different now. > Sigh, I fear I have to change this and that in the authentication > code in Cygwin... O.K. i'll try next release. > Unfortunately, this code is executed even if ntsec is off while another > piece of code which tries to evaluate the current user is partly not > executed when ntsec is off. AFAICS, this results in a misinterpretation > of the user information. Hmm, i never turn off ntsec if not trying a new port of some cute software. gph -- =^..^= -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple