Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:58:25 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin Subject: Re: Serial programming patch Message-ID: <20010523155825.B13499@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <3B0A5B48 DOT D8508D38 AT certum DOT pl> <20010522215504 DOT J10118 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3B0B6AF3 DOT 818DBC AT certum DOT pl> <20010523103252 DOT N10118 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3B0BA9DE DOT 71539C6F AT certum DOT pl> <20010523162929 DOT U10118 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010523162929.U10118@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:29:29PM +0200 On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 04:29:29PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:15:26PM +0200, Jacek Trzcinski wrote: >> Hi Corrina, >> I would not like bother You too much so I hope it is my last e-mail >> today. >> I created sources (with Your little help - thanks, I utilized >> os_being_run) at last >> are conforming to GNU coding. I also created my ChangeLog file. >> What concerns signing a copyright assignment form - is it really >> necessary ? > >Unfortunately, yes. I can't explain that really good. It's one of >the weirdnesses of the US copyright law. Actually, it's really simple. Red Hat needs to own all of the work in Cygwin. So, any contributions to cygwin have to be assigned to us. This is similar to the requirement that any work done to gcc or gdb need to be assigned to the FSF. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple