Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:24:11 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: todays update affect on telnet, rlogin & rsh Message-ID: <20010523172411.A10118@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <50A89B19AEAAD411B9D200A0C9FB5699B34AC7 AT craius DOT cportcorp DOT com> <20010523104404 DOT P10118 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010523104404.P10118@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:44:04AM +0200 Note-from-DJ: This may be spam On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 10:44:04AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 03:58:49PM -0400, Mark Keil wrote: > > Corinna, > > > > Sorry, being 3 deep in interrupts I didn't proof that line. > > > > It should read: > > If I run inetd from the command line, rsh no longer works, > > it just hangs. > > > > In fact it hangs on stdin, a ^d will get it to close. > > It ignores the command after the machine name. > > echo pwd | rsh ntbox echo xxx > > results in: //server/homedir > > and not in: xxx > > > > Any insight is appreciated. > > Sure, rshd is crap. That doesn't help? I know. I have changed > rshd in the meantime so that it works more reliable but I'm > not yet finished and the fact remains the same: rshd is crap. I'm just uploading a -14 version which contains a rearranged rshd. Should arrive on the mirrors tomorrow. It will still have errors but it should really behave more reliable than before. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple