Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:30:58 -0400
From: linguist-cygwin AT rich-paul DOT net
To: Karl M <karlm30 AT hotmail DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: ssh hanging
Message-ID: <20010522193058.B4807@monster.master-link.org>
References: <F147rblZz02H67yRLVb000046ca AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <F147rblZz02H67yRLVb000046ca@hotmail.com>; from karlm30@hotmail.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:28:38PM -0700
X-Operating-System: Linux monster 2.2.18-crypt

For what it's worth, I have a (somewhat) similar problem:

bash$ nohup ssh-agent > ~/.ssh-agent &
bash$ exit

causes the terminal window to hang there.  If I kill the term
window, ssh-agent may or may not die, but will not work.

Latest of everything, AFAIK, and Win2K.

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:28:38PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> Hi Corinna...
> 
> I started digging into this and found that
> 
> ssh -v -v -v -f localhost sleep 10
> 
> with a
> 
> sshd -d -d -d
> 
> run from an interactive bash shell hangs on both 2.9p1-1 and 2.5.2p2-3 at 
> the same place. The place is just after the protocol window is adjusted. 
> While, for me (win2k sp1, 1.3.1-1 dll),
> 
> ssh -v -v -v -f -L 5901:localhost:5900 localhost sleep 10
> 
> works fine with 2.5.2p2-3 but hangs with 2.9p1. When it hangs, the printout 
> looks identical to the hanging cases above.
> 
> It looks to me like protocol packets just stop getting received. I am 
> running protocol 2 only. You and I also had the differnece that I needed 
> pipes and you did not. Could this be related? I tried the May 16 snapshot 
> with the same results. What configuration did you test with? Im not quite 
> sure how to proceed further. I get the same results on three different 
> machines.
> 
> Why do you think that I need pipes and you do not?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> ...Karl
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple