Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 08:57:44 +0100
Message-ID: <6363-Sat19May2001085745+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I);
	VM 6.92 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
From: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.1: Objective-C not installed.
In-Reply-To: <20010518202528.B11048@redhat.com>
References: <BE020C49D751D3119E0B009027305015020938C7 AT goldmail DOT golder DOT com>
	<20010518202528 DOT B11048 AT redhat DOT com>

On Friday 18 May 01, Christopher Faylor writes:
> >What can I do to get Objective-C for my installation of Cygwin?
> 
> You have to build one yourself.  I don't distribute it with gcc 2.95.3 and
> have no plans on doing so.

I don't know what the Objective-C compiler is or why people think it
should be part of Cygwin's gcc-2.95, but I've seen this question come
up a few times recently.  Should I add it to the FAQ?

Regards,
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple