Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:48:28 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Status Access Violation
Message-ID: <20010516094828.T31266@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <E1B42CFD544FD31193EE0000E87C5CE7E07E5B AT mailserver2 DOT mqsoftware DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E1B42CFD544FD31193EE0000E87C5CE7E07E5B@mailserver2.mqsoftware.com>; from gcoakley@mqsoftware.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:42:44PM -0500

On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 04:42:44PM -0500, Glen Coakley wrote:
> 
> How can you tell by that stack trace that the exception was in Patrick's
> code? 
> Is it because the last 3 function addresses begin with 6100xxxx? If so, how
> does that address correlate to user functions?

No, it's because the upper addresses are _not_ beginning with 0x6100xxxx.
The user code begins at 0x00400000.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple